Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002412›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Sequence-Based Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction and Its Applications in Drug Discovery.

François Charih, James R Green, Kyle K Biggar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

François CharihDepartment of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7931-8921
James R GreenDepartment of Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6039-2355
Kyle K BiggarInstitute of Biochemistry, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada RGPIN-2023-04651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant protein-protein interactions (PPIs) underpin a plethora of human diseases, and disruption of these harmful interactions constitute a compelling treatment avenue. Advances in computational approaches to PPI prediction have closely followed progress in deep learning and natural language processing. In this review, we outline the state-of-the-art methods for sequence-based PPI prediction and explore their impact on target identification and drug discovery. We begin with an overview of commonly used training data sources and techniques used to curate these data to enhance the quality of the training set. Subsequently, we survey various PPI predictor types, including traditional similarity-based approaches, and deep learning-based approaches with a particular emphasis on transformer architecture. Finally, we provide examples of PPI prediction in system-level proteomics analyses, target identification, and designs of therapeutic peptides and antibodies. This review sheds light on sequence-based PPI prediction, a broadly applicable alternative to structure-based methods, from a unique perspective that emphasizes their roles in the drug discovery process and rigorous model assessment.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryProtein Interaction MappingProteinsComputational BiologyDeep LearningHumansProteomicsProteinsbiologicsdrug discoverydrug target identificationprotein language modelsprotein–protein interaction predictionsequence-based models

Identifiers

PMID41002412
PMCPMC12468386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.