ArticleBiosensors2025
Machine Learning-Based Framework for Pre-Impact Same-Level Fall and Fall-from-Height Detection in Construction Sites Using a Single Wearable Inertial Measurement Unit.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Same-level-falls (SLFs) and falls-from-height (FFHs) remain major causes of severe injuries and fatalities on construction sites. Researchers are actively developing fall-prevention systems requiring accurate SLF and FFH detection in construction settings prone to false positives. In this study, a machine learning-based approach was established for accurate identification of SLF, FFH, and non-fall events using a single waist-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU). A total of 48 participants executed 39 non-fall activities, 10 types of SLFs, and 8 types of FFHs, with a dummy used for falls exceeding 0.5 m. A two-stage feature extraction yielded 168 descriptors per data window, and an ensemble SHAP-PFI method selected the 153 most informative variables. The weighted XGBoost classifier, optimized via Bayesian techniques, outperformed other current boosting algorithms. Using 5-fold cross-validation, it achieved an average macro F1-score of 0.901 and macro Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.869, with a latency of 1.51 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.