ReviewBiosensors2025
Sophisticated Interfaces Between Biosensors and Organoids: Advancing Towards Intelligent Multimodal Monitoring Physiological Parameters.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Vascularized bone organoids: current advances and a biomimetic platform for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Bone research · 2026Review
- Cardiac microphysiological systems in cardiovascular research: Construction paradigms, maturation trajectories, and translational frontiers.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Construction of a sports bio mechanical injury prediction and AI warning system based on wearable sensors.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Virtual Organoids (AIVOs).Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Cell-Based Biosensors in Oral Health: Emerging Tools for Rapid Detection and Monitoring of Oral Diseases.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Living Tissues by Design: The Rise of Hybrid Models in Biofabrication.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Nano-engineered biomimetic materials: toward point-of-care diagnosis of infectious diseases.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The integration of organoids with biosensors serves as a miniaturized model of human physiology and diseases, significantly transforming the research frameworks surrounding drug development, toxicity testing, and personalized medicine. This review aims to provide a comprehensive framework for researchers to identify suitable technical approaches and to promote the advancement of organoid sensing towards enhanced biomimicry and intelligence. To this end, several primary methods for technology integration are systematically outlined and compared, which include microfluidic integrated systems, microelectrode array (MEA)-based electrophysiological recording systems, optical sensing systems, mechanical force sensing technologies, field-effect transistor (FET)-based sensing techniques, biohybrid systems based on synthetic biology tools, and label-free technologies, including impedance, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and mass spectrometry imaging. Through multimodal collaboration such as the combination of MEA for recording electrical signals from cardiac organoids with micropillar arrays for monitoring contractile force, these technologies can overcome the limitations inherent in singular sensing modalities and enable a comprehensive analysis of the dynamic responses of organoids. Furthermore, this review discusses strategies for integrating strategies of multimodal sensing approaches (e.g., the combination of microfluidics with MEA and optical methods) and highlights future challenges related to sensor implantation in vascularized organoids, signal stability during long-term culture, and the standardization of clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.