ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
BTS: a scalable Bayesian Tissue Score for prioritizing GWAS variants and their functional contexts across >1000s of omics datasets.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationstatistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are widely used in fine-mapping and colocalization analyses to identify causal variants and their enrichment in functional contexts, such as affected cell types and genomic features. With the expansion of functional genomic (FG) datasets, which now include hundreds of thousands of tracks across various cell and tissue types, it is critical to establish scalable algorithms integrating thousands of diverse FG annotations with GWAS results.
resultsWe propose BTS (Bayesian Tissue Score), a novel, highly efficient algorithm uniquely designed for (i) identifying affected cell types and functional elements (context-mapping) and (ii) fine-mapping potentially causal variants in a context-specific manner using large collections of cell type-specific FG annotation tracks. BTS leverages GWAS summary statistics and annotation-specific Bayesian models to analyze genome-wide annotation tracks, including enhancers, open chromatin, and histone marks. We evaluated BTS on GWAS summary statistics for immune and cardiovascular traits, such as Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). Our results demonstrate that BTS is over 100× more efficient in estimating functional annotation effects and context-specific variant fine-mapping compared to existing methods. Importantly, this large-scale Bayesian approach prioritizes both known and novel annotations, cell types, genomic regions, and variants and provides valuable biological insights into the functional contexts of these diseases. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Docker image is available at https://hub.docker.com/r/wanglab/bts with preinstalled BTS R package (https://bitbucket.org/wanglab-upenn/BTS-R) and BTS GWAS summary statistics analysis pipeline (https://bitbucket.org/wanglab-upenn/bts-pipeline).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.