Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002086›Full record

ArticleMagyar onkologia2025

[Modern surgical treatment of breast cancer. 5th Breast Cancer Consensus Conference].

György Lázár, Csaba Kósa, Róbert Maráz, Attila Paszt, Gábor Pavlovics, Zsolt Simonka, Dezső Tóth, Ákos Sávolt

Abstract readConsensus StatementEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Magyar onkologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

György LázárSebészeti Klinika, Szegedi Tudományegyetem ÁOK, Szeged, Hungary. gylazar@gmail.com.
Csaba KósaSebészeti Klinika, Debreceni Egyetem, Debrecen, Hungary.
Róbert MarázBács-Kiskun Megyei Önkormányzat Kórháza, Kecskemét, Hungary.
Attila PasztSebészeti Klinika, Szegedi Tudományegyetem ÁOK, Szeged, Hungary. gylazar@gmail.com.
Gábor PavlovicsSebészeti Klinika, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pécs, Hungary.
Zsolt SimonkaSebészeti Klinika, Szegedi Tudományegyetem ÁOK, Szeged, Hungary. gylazar@gmail.com.
Dezső TóthSebészeti Klinika, Debreceni Egyetem, Debrecen, Hungary.
Ákos SávoltOrszágos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical treatment is still the most effective method in curing of early breast cancer. Breast preservation and the application of oncoplastic principles became generally accepted, the sentinel lymph node biopsy in the surgical treatment of the axilla is primary, and the indication for axillary block dissection (ABD) is narrowing further. The neoadjuvant oncological treatment that is applied more and more widely presented surgery with new challenges. The expansion of quality assurance measures, the enhancement of breast surgery training, and the acceleration of centralisation through the establishment of dedicated breast cancer diagnostic and treatment centres are all anticipated to contribute significantly to the reduction of breast cancer mortality. Hereunder we summarise our recommendations on the surgical treatment of breast cancer based on the content of the 5th Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and considering the latest international studies and professional recommendations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomyAxillaFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalNeoadjuvant TherapySentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41002086
PMCPMC12495543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.