Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41002085›Full record

ArticleMagyar onkologia2025

[Pathological diagnosis, work-up and reporting of breast cancer. Recommendations of the 5th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer].

Gábor Cserni, Eszter Papp, Balázs Járay, Endre Kálmán, Tibor Krenács, Erika Tóth, Miklós Török, Nóra Udvarhelyi, András Vörös, Janina Kulka

Abstract readConsensus StatementEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Magyar onkologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gábor CserniPatológiai Osztály, Bács-Kiskun Vármegyei Kórház, Kecskemét, Hungary. cserni@freemail.hu.
Eszter PappOrszágos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs JárayPatológiai Osztály, Nyírő Gyula Kórház, Eurofins/Medserv Kft., Budapest, Hungary.
Endre KálmánPatológiai Intézet, Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Pécs, Hungary.
Tibor KrenácsPatológiai és Kísérleti Rákkutató Intézet, Semmelweis Egyetem, Budapest, Hungary.
Erika TóthOrszágos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
Miklós TörökPatológia, Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Központ, Debrecen, Hungary.
Nóra UdvarhelyiOrszágos Onkológiai Intézet, Budapest, Hungary.
András VörösPatológiai Intézet, Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Szeged, Hungary.
Janina KulkaPatológiai Osztály, Nyírő Gyula Kórház, Eurofins/Medserv Kft., Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a wide interdisciplinary consultation, the present recommendations have been finalized after their public discussion at the 5th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer. The recommendations cover non-operative, intraoperative and postoperative diagnostics, the determination of prognostic and predictive markers and the content of the cytology and histology reports. Furthermore, it touches some special issues such as the current status of multigene molecular markers, the role of pathologists in clinical trials and prerequisites for their involvement. The most important changes include the integration of the ASCO/CAP HER2 assessment guidelines from 2023, the reformulation of the role of cytology in breast cancer diagnostics, diagnostic categories of non-operative lymph node assessment, and the revision of PD-L1 assessment related information. The recommendations include the core and non-core elements of the ICCR (International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting) breast cancer related datasets.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansHungaryPrognosisB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID41002085
PMCPMC12495542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.