ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Sexually deceptive orchids with distinct flower morphologies elicit different behaviours from a shared pollinator.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPollination by sexual deception is one of the most specialized pollination strategies among angiosperms, with co-occurring plant species often exploiting males of different insect species. We test if the morphologically divergent orchids Caladenia cardiochila and its sympatric endangered congener C. lowanensis are dependent on the same thynnine wasp pollinator. We further investigate the role of floral traits on pollinator behaviour and evaluate potential hybridization risk.
methodsPollinator sharing was tested for with DNA barcoding. Pollinator behaviour was quantified and experimental floral dissections were used to determine the site of sexual attractant release. We employed GC-MS to test for the presence of sugar on orchid labella, hand crosses to assess the impact of interspecific pollen transfer on seed viability, and population monitoring to quantify natural pollination success. KEY
resultsWe found that C. cardiochila and C. lowanensis both employ sexual deception of Phymatothynnus aff. nitidus wasps as a pollination strategy. However, the behaviour they elicit differs, with wasps attempting to mate with the insectiform labellum in C. cardiochila and the glandular sepal tips in C. lowanensis, which are the respective sources of sexual attractant. Unlike most sexually deceptive orchids, C. lowanensis secretes minute amounts of sugar from its labellum. While wasps interacted more frequently with the labellum in C. cardiochila, placing them closer to its reproductive structures, both species exhibited comparable pollination success and pollen transfer efficiency. Experimental crosses revealed that hybrid seed has high viability.
conclusionsSexual deception of the same pollinator by orchids varying in the location of sexual attractant and flower morphology highlights the considerable flexibility of this pollination strategy. Given their overlapping distributions and the viability of hybrid seed, pollinator sharing poses a hybridization risk that needs to be considered in the management of wild C. lowanensis populations and future conservation translocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.