ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
Comparative evaluation of disc diffusion and broth microdilution methods for aztreonam/avibactam susceptibility testing in Enterobacterales.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAztreonam/avibactam is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combination active against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), including MBL-producing isolates. In May 2024, EUCAST published Enterobacterales breakpoints for aztreonam/avibactam. This study aimed to assess the performance of commercially available disc diffusion (DD) against broth microdilution (BMD) using the latest EUCAST breakpoints.
methodsWe tested 278 CRE causing infections in 17 Greek ICUs between 2021 and 2023, using 30/20 μg aztreonam/avibactam discs and BMD according to EUCAST methodology and EUCAST version 15.0 breakpoints.
resultsMost isolates were identified as Klebsiella pneumoniae (97.8%), and 98.9% produced carbapenemases, including 46.4% KPC, 20.1% NDM, 5.4% VIM and 27% multiple carbapenemases. Using BMD, 94.2% of isolates were susceptible to aztreonam/avibactam. Conversely, using DD, 66.9% were susceptible, 33.1% resistant and 27% within the area of technical uncertainty (ATU). Most isolates in the ATU were KPC-producing (68%) or KPC and MBL-producing (29.3%). All isolates in the ATU (22-24 mm) tested susceptible by BMD (MIC ≤ 4 mg/L). One isolate exhibited resistance by DD (20 mm), but was susceptible by BMD. Categorical agreement (CA) was 72.7%, with 29% major errors (MEs) and 0% very major errors (VMEs). Using a breakpoint of 22 mm, CA, ME and VME were 99.6%, 0.4% and 0%, respectively.
conclusionsAztreonam/avibactam showed potent in vitro activity against MBL- and KPC-producing Enterobacterales. Using the 2025 EUCAST breakpoint, all isolates in the ATU tested susceptible by BMD, leading to high MEs of the DD method. A 22 mm breakpoint would have corrected this discrepancy in our cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.