Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001682›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia reports

Anaesthetic management of colorectal surgery in a patient with chronic pericardial effusion.

E Ahmad, H S Liu, A Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E AhmadShrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust Shrewsbury UK.
H S LiuShrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust Shrewsbury UK.
A MillerShrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust Shrewsbury UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-1514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pericardial effusions are a peri-operative challenge as anaesthesia and surgery can precipitate haemodynamic compromise. Guidance for managing patients requiring time-sensitive non-cardiac surgery in this setting is limited. We report the case of a 43-year-old woman with a moderate chronic, asymptomatic pericardial effusion scheduled for robotic anterior resection of rectal cancer. The principal challenge was balancing the need for time-sensitive oncological surgery against the risk of haemodynamic compromise in the context of suboptimal pre-operative cardiology assessment. Surgery proceeded after multidisciplinary discussion, with pre-emptive vasopressor support and intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography monitoring to guide management. The peri-operative course was stable, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 4. Two months later, she required pericardial window formation for a persistent effusion which had become symptomatic. This case illustrates that non-cardiac surgery in chronic, asymptomatic pericardial effusion can be performed safely when guided by physiological reasoning, real-time echocardiography and multidisciplinary planning.

Indexed as

colorectal surgeryechocardiography, transoesophagealhaemodynamicspericardial effusion

Identifiers

PMID41001682
PMCPMC12460003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.