ArticleJACS Au2025
Molecular Interactions within Nanoconfinement of Model DNA Nanostructures Controlled by Compensatory Kinetics as Revealed by Single-Molecule Fluorescence Analysis.
Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular interactions under steric confinement are important in chemistry, biology, biotechnology, and medicine. The impact of nanoconfinement on the underpinning kinetics and affinities is, however, unclear. While theoretical frameworks predict any effect only for very fast diffusion-limited association kinetics, experimental studies report that molecules can be trapped inside confined spaces to increase the effective local concentration and impact binding kinetics. Understanding is furthermore complicated by poorly comparable confinement geometries and reactions. Here, we determine the kinetics and affinities for interactions slower than the diffusion limit using highly modular DNA origami nanopores as model nanoconfinement systems. The pores feature either inside or outside their narrow lumen a single receptor, which can bind to three differently sized biomolecular ligands. We conduct kinetic binding analysis at the single-molecule resolution using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy to readily acquire large datasets and help overcome limitations of other single-molecule approaches. Nanoconfinement is found to hinder ligand association and dissociation, even below the diffusion limit. Yet, both suppressed kinetics compensate for each other to yield the same overall equillibrium affinity as nonconfined receptors, while local concentration enhancement by ligand trapping was not observed. We expect our insights and experimental strategy to guide the development of biosensing nanopores and help advance the understanding of biological nanochannels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.