ArticleResearch square2025
LUCID: Intelligent Informative Frame Selection in Otoscopy for Enhanced Diagnostic Utilitys.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of middle ear diseases, such as acute otitis media (AOM), remains a clinical challenge due to the reliance on subjective visual assessment through otoscopy. While deep learning has shown promise in improving diagnostic accuracy using digital otoscopy videos, existing models often rely on manually selected still frames, a step that reduces their practicality in real-world clinical workflows. In this study, we present the first systematic method (LUCID) for automatically identifying the most informative frame (MIF) selection in otoscopy videos. Through analyzing of 713 videos, we identified three key factors that impact frame informativeness: eardrum visibility, eardrum coverage, and image clarity. We then develop a novel MIF pipeline that integrates (1) a ResNet-50 classifier trained on over 38,000 labeled frames to assess eardrum visibility, (2) a binary-adversarial CAM (BC-AdvCAM) method for weakly supervised eardrum segmentation and coverage estimation, and (3) a specialized blur and focus detection algorithm tailored to otoscope imagery. These components are combined into an "informative score" to rank frames automatically. Comparative evaluations using human reviewers and diagnostic AI models show that frames selected by our AI method perform comparably to expert-selected frames-achieving similar classification accuracy across multiple deep learning architectures. Notably, using the top four frames per video identified by our method significantly improves diagnostic accuracy over using a single expert-selected frame. This framework offers a scalable, expert-level tool for automating key frame selection and enhancing AI-based otoscopy diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.