ArticleResearch square2025
Three-Dimensional Bone Morphology for Identifying Risk Factors for Jones Fractures using Statistical Shape Modeling: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Jones fractures are fifth metatarsal stress fractures frequently seen in athletes and often lead to delayed union, non-union, and refracture. Identifying risk factors for Jones fractures is essential for prevention. While two-dimensional (2D) imaging has provided insights, it cannot adequately assess three-dimensional (3D) bone morphology. Statistical shape modeling (SSM) enables comprehensive 3D evaluation of anatomical variations, although its role in Jones fractures remains unclear. This study aimed to identify 3D morphological factors associated with Jones fractures using SSM and assess postoperative morphological changes. Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, we analyzed 20 patients with Jones fractures and 20 matched controls. All patients underwent headless compression screw fixation. Computed tomography was used to create 3D models of the fifth metatarsal. Segmentation and alignment were performed, followed by SSM with ShapeWorks. Principal component analysis (PCA) identified shape variations. Statistical comparisons were made between preoperative fracture cases and controls and between preoperative and postoperative cases. Results: SSM identified six significant PCA modes, accounting for 78.3% of shape variation. The second mode showed significant differences between fracture patients and controls (p = 1.32e-04), demonstrating greater adduction of the metatarsal base, reduced articular surface, proximally extended tuberosity, and straighter, thicker shaft in fracture cases. No significant postoperative morphological changes were observed. Conclusion: Distinct 3D morphological characteristics of the fifth metatarsal-including base adduction, proximal tuberosity extension, and shaft straightening-may increase susceptibility to Jones fractures. The absence of postoperative changes suggests that surgical fixation does not alter these features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.