ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Stratifies Risk of Mortality and Graft Dysfunction in Severe Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac acute rejection (AR) is a risk factor for poor outcomes, however there are limited risk prediction models to stratify patients for death or sustained LV dysfunction. This study assesses the prognostic utility of percentage donor-derived cell-free DNA (%dd-cfDNA) at the diagnosis of AR for poor outcomes. Methods: The prospective multicenter GRAfT study enrolled heart transplant recipients and collected serial plasma samples to quantitate %dd-cfDNA. AR was defined as acute cellular rejection (ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), as well as biopsy-negative AMR (donor-specific antibody positivity with LV dysfunction). AR was classified as mild-to-moderate (ACR grade 2 or AMR grade 1) or severe (ACR grade ≥3, AMR grade ≥2, or DSA+/LV dysfunction) and further stratified by a %dd-cfDNA threshold of 0.25%. Regression models assessed the association between AR and %dd-cfDNA levels at the AR diagnosis with the primary composite outcome of sustained LVEF decline <50% and/or death. Results: The study included 275 patients and 3,190 %dd-cfDNA assessments. Over the median of 4.6 (IQR 1.8 - 5.0) years follow-up, 51 patients experienced the composite outcome of death or prolonged EF reduction, and 75 patients developed AR, including 16.2% patients with ACR, 9.4% with pathologic AMR, and 6.6% with DSA+/LV dysfunction. Thirty-two (42.7%) patients had severe AR and 43 (57.3%) had mild-to-moderate AR. Severe-but not mild-to-moderate-AR was associated with an increased risk of the primary composite endpoint (HR = 5.17, 95% CI 2.38 - 11.3, p < 0.001). Among those with severe AR, a %dd-cfDNA level greater than 0.25% at diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome (HR, 6.06, 95% CI, 1.78-20.6; p = 0.004). Percent dd-cfDNA remained elevated in severe AR patients with adverse outcomes. Conclusion: Severe AR with high %dd-cfDNA levels is associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes, offering novel prognostic utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.