ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Remote Intervention to Support Caregivers of Latino People with Dementia: Feasibility Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and objectives: Latino people with dementia and their caregivers have poor mental health. We tested the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a texting and phone call intervention to support informal caregivers of Latino people with dementia. Research design and methods: We enrolled 100 caregivers of 84 Latino people with dementia into a one-arm pre-post intervention trial. This caregiver intervention was remote, bilingual, lasted six months and included optional monthly phone calls to address unmet needs, and a bidirectional texting program focused on dementia education, skill-building and community resources. Outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy (e.g., depressive symptomatology) within six months, measured via surveys and metrics of intervention usage. Results: Eighty-eight percent of caregivers completed the follow-up assessment. Four caregivers unsubscribed from the intervention, 69.0% held at least one phone call visit, 91.0% sent at least one text message, 95.5% reported complying with at least some intervention recommendations, and 95.0% reported very or extremely high satisfaction levels. Effect sizes of change in all preliminary efficacy outcomes increased gradually as we restricted samples to those with worse baseline outcome values. Discussion: The intervention demonstrated high levels of acceptability and feasibility. Phone calls did not engage caregivers as much as texting. Implications: Future efficacy studies should restrict their eligibility criteria based on their outcome of interest. Outcomes with most efficacy promise include caregiver distress, depression and life satisfaction, and person with dementia's depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.