ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Deep learning-based prediction of cardiopulmonary disease in retinal images of premature infants.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality in premature infants. Objective: To determine whether images obtained as part of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening might contain features associated with BPD and PH in infants, and whether a multimodal model integrating imaging features with demographic risk factors might outperform a model based on demographic risk alone. Design: A deep learning model was used to study retinal images collected from patients enrolled in the multi-institutional Imaging and Informatics in Retinopathy of Prematurity (i-ROP) study. Setting: Seven neonatal intensive care units. Participants: 493 infants at risk for ROP undergoing routine ROP screening examinations from 2012 to 2020. Images were limited to <=34 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) so as to precede the clinical diagnosis of BPD or PH. Exposure: BPD was diagnosed by the presence of an oxygen requirement at 36 weeks PMA, and PH was diagnosed by echocardiogram at 34 weeks. A support vector machine model was trained to predict BPD, or PH, diagnosis using: A) image features alone (extracted using Resnet18), B) demographics alone, C) image features concatenated with demographics. To reduce the possibility of confounding with ROP, secondary models were trained using only images without clinical signs of ROP. Main Outcome Measure: For both BPD and PH, we report performance on a held-out testset (99 patients from the BPD cohort and 37 patients from the PH cohort), assessed by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: For BPD, the diagnostic accuracy of a multimodal model was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.90), compared to demographics 0.72 (0.60-0.82; P=0.07) or imaging 0.72 (0.61-0.82; P=0.002) alone. For PH, it was 0.91 (0.71-1.0) combined compared to 0.68 (0.43-0.9; P=0.04) for demographics and 0.91 (0.78-1.0; P=0.4) for imaging alone. These associations remained even when models were trained on the subset of images without any clinical signs of ROP. Conclusions and Relevance: Retinal images obtained during ROP screening can be used to predict the diagnosis of BPD and PH in preterm infants, which may lead to earlier diagnosis and avoid the need for invasive diagnostic testing in the future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.