ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Global capacity for implementing the Eight Practical Steps to achieve universal access to water, sanitation, and hygiene in healthcare facilities: a qualitative study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targets to achieve universal access to environmental health services include healthcare facilities. To support improvement efforts, the World Health Organization and UNICEF published the "Eight Practical Steps," a roadmap for countries to achieve universal access. This document provides clear directions, but many steps are ambitious, and countries' readiness to complete them is unclear. We conducted a qualitative study to evaluate stakeholder readiness to implement the Eight Practical Steps and documented capacity development needs, using interviews with 45 participants. We applied an implementation science theory-organizational readiness for change-to structure our interviews around factors influencing readiness. Readiness was highest for conducting baseline situation assessments (Step 1), establishing standards (Step 3), improving infrastructure (Step 4), and strengthening the health workforce (Step 6). Readiness was enhanced by stakeholder cooperation, positive attitudes for change, and availability of tools for monitoring, risk assessment, and healthcare worker training. Capacity development was needed to tailor situation assessment tools, training materials, and standards for different contexts. Readiness for change was lower for developing costed roadmaps (Step 2), monitoring progress (Step 5), engaging communities (Step 7), and conducting operational research (Step 8). Stakeholders prioritized earlier steps and had not yet dedicated substantial effort or resources to later ones. Barriers included a lack of tools and guidance. Our results indicate enthusiasm and cooperation to improve environmental health services, but rapid action sometimes came at the expense of strategic planning and learning opportunities. We recommend strengthening funding, personnel, and technical support for planning, monitoring, evaluation, and operational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.