ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Clinical modifiers of the association between type 1 diabetes and dementia incidence.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with elevated dementia risk, but the mechanisms are not well understood. Prior studies suggest that co-occurring diabetes-related complications and other comorbidities may further increase dementia risk, but these studies are few and typically have small samples. Whether diabetes-related complications and other comorbidities modify the effect of T1DM on dementia risk remains unclear. Methods: Data are from participants of the All of Us (AoU) cohort ages ≥ 50 years, with complete baseline surveys, linked electronic health records (EHRs), and either T1DM or no DM. Enrollment began in 2017, with data available through October 2023, including information prior to enrollment in AoU. Incident dementia was identified based on ICD-9, ICD-10, and SNOMED codes in participants' EHRs. Baseline clinical comorbidities (diabetes complications and eye diseases, other vascular and metabolic comorbidities, and mental health conditions) were also identified using participants' EHRs, classifying each as present if at least one diagnostic code occurred on or before the baseline survey. Results: Among 232,429 participants (mean [SD] age 64.5 [9.0] years; 57.3% women), 2.3% had a T1DM diagnosis. Participants averaged 1.67 total comorbidities (SD = 2.08). T1DM and each comorbidity was associated with higher dementia incidence. T1DM was associated with higher dementia incidence among individuals with no comorbidities (HR = 1.77; 95% CI: 0.95-3.30), though the CI included 1. Each additional comorbidity increased risk (HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.19-1.26), with some evidence that the effect of T1DM differed by the number of comorbidities (HR = 0.94; 95% CI:0.86-1.01). The combined estimated effect of T1DM and most comorbidities was less than multiplicative. Depression was an exception; the dementia HR for individuals with both T1DM and depression (HR = 5.47; 95% CI: 4.23, 7.08) roughly reflected what would have been expected based on the HR for T1DM (HR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.38, 2.92) times the HR for depression among those without T1DM (HR = 2.55; 95% CI: 2.22, 2.95). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that T1DM and common comorbidities independently increase dementia risk, though their combined effects are generally less than multiplicative. However, depression in the context of T1DM is associated with major elevations in dementia risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.