ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Revisiting the Role of Structural Connectivity-Based Parcellation in Thalamic Nuclei Segmentation: comparison with recent state-of-the-art methods.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate thalamic nuclei segmentation is critical for neuroscience research and clinical interventions such as deep brain stimulation and magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound. Connectivity based parcellation has been widely used for two decades, yet its anatomical validity remains uncertain compared with newer imaging approaches. Methods: We analyzed high resolution diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and T1 weighted data from 67 healthy young adults in the Human Connectome Project. Connectivity based parcellation was performed using probabilistic tractography with cortical targets derived from the HCP MMP1 atlas, generating 8, 11, and 23 region parcellations. Results were compared against three state of the art methods: orientation distribution function (ODF) clustering, track density imaging (TDI), and the structural MRI based segmentation. Group level analyses were conducted in Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (MNI) space, and Dice overlap coefficients were calculated against the histology based Morel atlas. Results: Connectivity based parcellation demonstrated limited anatomical precision, with increasing cortical target counts introducing greater variability and noise without improving nuclear boundary definition. ODF clustering and TDI recovered subdivisions consistent with cytoarchitectonic patterns, particularly in the pulvinar and mediodorsal nuclei. Structural MRI based segmentation achieved the highest overall Dice coefficients, closely approximating Morel defined boundaries, while Connectivity based parcellation consistently underperformed across nuclei. Conclusion: Despite methodological advances, Connectivity based parcellation remains constrained in its ability to delineate thalamic nuclei with histological accuracy. By contrast, structural and diffusion microstructural (ODF, TDI) approaches provide superior nuclear localization. These findings highlight the need for hybrid workflows that integrate structural and diffusion based information to enable more reliable thalamic segmentation for research and clinical targeting applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.