ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
MPVT+: a noise-robust training framework for automatic liver tumor segmentation with noisy labels.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Liver cancer is among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Accurate delineation of hepatic tumors is crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning, yet manual annotation is labor-intensive and subject to variability. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown promise in automating segmentation but require large amounts of high-quality labeled data, which is difficult to obtain. Incorporating noisy labels without proper handling can corrupt training and degrade performance. Methods: We introduce MPVT+, a noise-robust training framework that integrates a pixel-wise noise-adaptation module with a multi-stage perturbation and variable-teacher (MPVT) consistency strategy. The noise adaptor infers corruption probabilities and re-weights unreliable supervision, while MPVT assembles an ensemble of stochastic teacher models that apply progressively stringent perturbations. This combination enables the network to exploit both clean and noisy labels without overfitting. Results: Experiments conducted on 739 retrospectively collected liver-tumor CT datasets demonstrated that MPVT+ significantly outperformed baseline and traditional noise-handling approaches. Compared to a noise-free U-Net baseline (Dice Similarity Coefficient [DSC] 75.1%), MPVT+ improved segmentation accuracy to 80.3%. The framework consistently achieved superior results across multiple evaluation metrics, including DSC, JSC, SVD, and VOE. Discussion: The MPVT+ framework demonstrates that principled noise modeling, coupled with consistency training, effectively unlocks the potential of imperfect medical datasets. This strategy reduces the dependency on perfectly labeled datasets and moves fully automated liver tumor delineation closer to clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.