ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Post-cholecystectomy Syndrome in Patients With Gallstone Disease: A Critical Appraisal.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for gallstones, offering a minimally invasive approach with quicker recovery times. Despite its effectiveness, a significant proportion of patients experience persistent symptoms post-surgery, collectively referred to as post-cholecystectomy syndrome (PCS). The incidence, causes, and management of PCS remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of PCS among adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallstone disease at Pilgrim Hospital, Boston, UK, and to identify potential contributing factors.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study, reviewing data from patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 1, 2024, and July 31, 2024. Data were collected through electronic records and patient questionnaires completed over the phone. The study analyzed patient demographics, symptoms post-surgery, and subsequent investigations and treatments.
resultsOut of 50 patients included in the study, 17 (34%) reported ongoing symptoms consistent with PCS. The most common symptoms were right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain (48%) and diarrhea (33%). Further investigations, including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), were required for seven patients (41%) due to persistent symptoms. Five of the 17 patients (29%) were readmitted due to complications, such as infections and bile leaks. Despite these issues, 88% of PCS patients reported improved quality of life post-surgery.
conclusionOur study found that 34% of patients experienced persistent symptoms of PCS following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. While most reported an improvement in quality of life, a significant number required additional investigations and readmissions. The findings suggest that PCS remains an under-recognized condition and further research is needed to identify its underlying causes and improve diagnostic protocols. Standardized diagnostic criteria and long-term follow-up could help in better managing these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.