ReviewCureus2025
Radiation in the Orthopedic Operating Room: What We Know, What We Do, and What Needs Attention.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating radiation protection knowledge and practices in operating room personnel: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Occupational Radiation Risk Stratification and Protection in Fluoroscopy-Guided Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Multispecialty Structured Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgeons and operating room staff are frequently exposed to ionizing radiation, particularly during fluoroscopy-guided procedures in trauma and spine surgery. Despite established safety protocols, significant gaps remain in awareness, training, and adherence to best practices. While personal protective equipment such as lead aprons, thyroid shields, and lead glasses is effective, their inconsistent use leaves healthcare workers vulnerable. Recent studies raise particular concern over elevated cancer risks, including breast cancer among female orthopedic surgeons. Technological improvements and procedural modifications, such as pulsed fluoroscopy and optimized C-arm positioning, reduce exposure considerably but require wider adoption. Greater emphasis on education, adherence to regulations, and gender-specific research is essential to enhance radiation safety and protect the orthopedic workforce. This narrative review focuses on the risks associated with ionizing radiation use in orthopedic surgery, factors influencing exposure, as well as techniques and protective equipment that can be utilized to lower the risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.