Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001255›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025

UEFA consensus statement on menstrual cycle tracking in women's football.

Evert Verhagen, Eva Ferrer, Juliana da Silva Antero, Zoran Bahtijarevic, Ally Barlow, Caroline Bolling, Meritxell Gabarro, Michael Harrison, Priscilla Jarrin, Xanne Janse de Jonge and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Evert VerhagenMedical & Anti-doping Unit, Football Division, Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Nyon, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-8234
Eva FerrerBarça Innovation Hub of Football Club Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Juliana da Silva AnteroInstitute for Research in Medicine and Epidemiology of Sports (IRMES), Université Paris Cité, INSEP, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6894-6693
Zoran BahtijarevicMedical & Anti-doping Unit, Football Division, Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), Nyon, Switzerland.
Ally BarlowChelsea FC, London, UK.
Caroline BollingAmsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Meritxell GabarroMedical Department FC Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Michael HarrisonChelsea FC, London, UK.
Priscilla JarrinMedical Department FC Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xanne Janse de JongeGriffith Sports Science, School of Allied Health, Sport and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Emma PaternotteAmsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rita TomásFPF Academy, Portuguese Football Federation, Algés, Portugal.
Carlos JimenezAmsterdam Collaboration on Health and Safety in Sports, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Nicola KeayDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
G LewinArsenal Women's Football Club, London, UK.
Elke van den SteenAZ Saint John's Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.
Kirsty Elliott-SaleDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University Institute of Sport, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-5099

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menstrual cycle tracking is increasingly recognised as an important aspect of supporting female athletes. However, its application in football remains inconsistent and under-researched. This consensus statement, initiated by the Union of European Football Associations Medical and Anti-Doping Unit, provides evidence-informed guidance on best practices for menstrual cycle tracking in women's football. Developed using the RAND-UCLA appropriateness method, the consensus involved a multidisciplinary expert panel that reviewed the literature and reached agreement on 82 statements across five key domains: the rationale for tracking, meaningful metrics, appropriate methods, implementation strategies and methodological considerations for research. The consensus underscores that while current evidence linking menstrual cycle phases to performance or injury risk remains inconclusive, tracking can support athlete well-being by identifying menstrual irregularities, managing symptoms and enhancing player education and autonomy. Practical recommendations are provided for measuring cycle characteristics, ovulation, hormonal profiles and symptoms, whereas ethical and cultural considerations are emphasised. This statement aims to promote standardised, athlete-centred tracking protocols and establish priorities for practice and future research in female football.

Indexed as

ConsensusFemaleWomen

Identifiers

PMID41001255
PMCPMC12458775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.