Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001247›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Weaving birth: interdependence and the fungal turn.

Michelle Sadler, Sara Cohen Shabot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michelle SadlerDepartamento de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Facultad de Artes Liberales, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Sara Cohen ShabotThe Women's and Gender Studies Program, The Faculty of Humanities, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we approach childbirth through the lens of the "fungal turn," using fungal mycelial networks as a conceptual and metaphorical resource for rethinking birth as a relational experience of collective care. Like fungi, which thrive through mutualistic, multispecies relationships, childbirth unfolds within dense networks of biological, social, and ecological connections; between pregnant person and fetus, caregivers, communities, and environments. We draw on our own contrasting childbirth experiences -one shaped by obstetric violence and the need for hyper-vigilant control, the other by trust, safety, and the capacity to surrender- to illustrate how different models of care either reinforce the logic of autonomous, isolated, and bounded birthing subjects or, in contrast, highlight their vulnerability, interconnectedness, and permeability. Our analysis combines a descriptive phenomenological approach, to convey the lived experience of birth in its sensory, embodied immediacy, with a hermeneutical phenomenological approach, which situates and interprets these experiences within the broader cultural and relational frameworks that shape them. Phenomenological insights on intercorporeality challenge the idea of the autonomous subject, reframing subjectivity as emerging through inherently embodied and interconnected engagements with others and the world. In this framework, the fungal metaphor illuminates how the weaving of interdependence unsettles dominant modern conceptions of agency and individuation, offering new ways to imagine what constitutes a positive birth.

Indexed as

fungal turninterconnectednessinterdependencephenomenologypositive childbirth

Identifiers

PMID41001247
PMCPMC12457297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.