ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
The vicious circle: how systemic barriers perpetuate maternity interpreting service inadequacies for migrant women in the UK.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Advancing maternal health equity: the need for cultural awareness and inclusivity in maternity service delivery in the UK: anchored in the MBRRACE-UK 2025 findings.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Equitable and culturally sensitive perinatal mental health screening and referral for all: experiences and needs from primary care and community-based healthcare providers.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Migrant women who speak languages other than English in the UK face elevated risks of adverse birth outcomes and experience significant maternal health disparities, conditions exacerbated by persistent inadequacies in interpreting service availability, quality, and costs. While video-mediated interpreting has been proposed as a solution, little is known about the systemic barriers that might limit its effectiveness in real-world settings. Methods: This study employed a transformative mixed-methods approach to investigate systemic barriers in maternity interpreting services, focusing on interpreter retention, service availability, and video-mediated interpreting implementation, specifically LanguageLine Solutions' interpreter-on-wheels (IOW). Data were collected in the UK between 2019 and 2022 from seven key stakeholder groups: Migrant women ( Results: The analysis revealed three interconnected systemic barriers forming a vicious circle in interpreting service provision: (1) Constrained user agency, where migrant women prioritised basic access to any interpreting support over preferences for service quality due to systematic service failures; (2) interpreter workforce sustainability crisis, with nearly 60.4% of interpreters having decreased or stopped healthcare interpreting assignments due to poor remuneration and better opportunities elsewhere; (3) infrastructure implementation failures, with interpreter-on-wheels implementation hampered by unreliable infrastructure, achieving only 11% utilisation despite its potential benefits. Discussion: These findings demonstrate how interpreting service challenges form an interconnected system where workforce issues, technical infrastructure, and institutional practices mutually reinforce one another, creating a vicious circle that perpetuates service inadequacies. This study advances understanding of the systemic nature of interpreting service challenges in maternity care for migrant women and highlights the need for coordinated interventions that address multiple interconnected barriers simultaneously, rather than isolated technological solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.