Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001227›Full record

ReviewO&G open2024

Timing of Antidepressant Use in Pregnancy and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jenny Wang, Debosree Roy, Mary Ying-Fang Wang, Diana Dinh, Ailina Lao, Valeria Mendoza, Gillian Xu, Carolyn G Chatterton, Nazanin Ahmadieh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in O&G open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Single-cell-level digital twins for preterm birth prevention strategies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jenny WangA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.
Debosree RoyA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.
Mary Ying-Fang WangA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.
Diana DinhA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.
Ailina LaoA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.
Valeria MendozaA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.
Gillian XuA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.
Carolyn G ChattertonA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.
Nazanin AhmadiehA.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, Mesa, Arizona; the Department of Research Support, A.T. Still University, Kirksville, Missouri; and Multicare Auburn Medical Center, Auburn, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the implication of timing of antidepressant exposure on preterm birth to better guide clinical counseling. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, using PubMed, MEDLINE Complete, EBSCO, CINAHL Plus, and ClinicalTrials.gov along with a manual search of references in relevant publications. The databases were searched between January 2000 and December 2022 with the following keywords: antidepressants, antidepressant medication, SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, TCA, or SNRI AND pregnancy, pregnant, prenatal, antenatal, perinatal, maternal AND trimester or timing AND preterm or premature. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The database search resulted in 162 studies. The 13 studies that met inclusion criteria compared preterm birth rates in pregnant patients exposed to antidepressants at a specified time in pregnancy (early, late, or throughout pregnancy) and a control group. Covidence was used for screening and data extraction. Excel and R were used for tabulation and statistical analysis, respectively. TABULATION INTEGRATION AND

resultsOf the 13 studies, nine measured preterm birth rates with antidepressant use in early pregnancy, 10 in late pregnancy, and four throughout pregnancy. Separate random effects models were used to synthesize the effect sizes from studies that did not adjust for presence of maternal depression in the study sample and those that did. In each model, subgroup analysis was conducted to assess the effect of timing of antidepressant exposure on the odds of preterm birth. In the model unadjusted for depression, pooled odds ratios (ORs) for the association between use of antidepressants and preterm birth were 1.41 (95% CI, 1.10-1.81) in early pregnancy, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.26-1.82) in late pregnancy, and 2.79 (95% CI, 1.27-6.12) throughout pregnancy. After adjusting for depression, the pooled ORs were 1.04 (95% CI, 0.83-1.31) in early pregnancy, 1.26 (95% CI, 0.95-1.66) in late pregnancy, and 1.79 (95% CI, 0.54-5.91) throughout pregnancy. No significant effect of timing was found in either model.

conclusionAntidepressant use in pregnancy was not associated with preterm birth, regardless of timing of use. Pregnant patients with an established diagnosis of depression should receive individualized counseling regarding antidepressant use while taking into consideration their risk factors for preterm birth and the implications of untreated depression. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42023390136.

Identifiers

PMID41001227
PMCPMC12456488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.