Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001204›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Scanning faces: a deep learning approach to studying eye movements in prosopagnosia.

Atlas Kazemian, Ipek Oruc, Jason J S Barton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atlas KazemianDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ipek OrucDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jason J S BartonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthy individuals show fixation biases when scanning faces, likely toward the regions that are most informative for identifying faces. Some reports suggest that subjects with prosopagnosia, an impairment in face recognition, have anomalous face scanning. Objective: Our goal was to determine whether an approach using artificial intelligence could identify key scanning markers of prosopagnosia. Methods: We used an image-classification technique based on deep learning to study the fixations of subjects with and without prosopagnosia during a face recognition task. We identified the number of fixations that maximizes classification performance and developed two methods of displaying scanpaths as images, each used to train a convolutional neural network. Results: Optimal classification of acquired prosopagnosic from control trials required four fixations, with an AUC of 80%. The model showed a greater tendency to fixate the lower face and the right eye in acquired prosopagnosia. Optimal classification of developmental prosopagnosic from control trials required 16 fixations, with an AUC of 69%. Fixations on developmental prosopagnosic trials were shifted more toward peripheral regions. When the classifier trained to discriminate acquired prosopagnosia from controls was asked to analyze the developmental prosopagnosic trials, the latter were classified as being more like control scanpaths. Conclusion: Only a few fixations during face scanning are required to differentiate controls from acquired prosopagnosia, with the latter showing anomalous biases. Developmental prosopagnosic scanpaths resemble degraded control scanpaths rather than anomalous biases. This study shows the potential of deep learning to identify abnormal behavioral markers in a disorder of complex visual processing.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedevelopmentalface recognitionneural networkscanpath

Identifiers

PMID41001204
PMCPMC12459115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.