ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2025
Reflective Experiences of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee's Members for the Women's Health Hospital in Riyadh.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Healthcare commissioning is crucial for addressing the increasing demands of the patient population while reducing maintenance and management costs. However, commissioning committee members can encounter several challenges. Therefore, this study comprehensively examined the experiences of members of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee involved in commissioning the Women's Health Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: An exploratory qualitative design was used, utilizing semi-structured interviews guided by Gibbs's reflective cycle. A sample of 11 participants representing diverse healthcare professions was included to capture a broad spectrum of insights. The interviews were conducted within a supportive and anonymous framework, adhering rigorously to the ethical standards established by the King Abdullah International Research Center and Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs. Results: The findings revealed three main themes: (i) the role of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee members, (ii) the reflective experiences of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee members, and (iii) the recommendations of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee members. These advancements were primarily attributed to the effective communication and collaboration among members. Conclusion: Although the task complexities posed certain challenges, the participants viewed them as valuable learning experiences that contributed to their growth. The Commissioning Final Readiness Committee can significantly impact the commissioning process. Despite encountering uncontrollable factors, maintaining a cohesive team allows members to effectively navigate these difficulties and achieve professional growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.