Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001190›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2025

Reflective Experiences of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee's Members for the Women's Health Hospital in Riyadh.

Anqaa Almutairi, Abdulmohsen Alsaawi, Abdulaleem Alatassi, Abdulrahman Abdullah Alghanem, Sarah Blaheed Almutairi, Mufareh Alkatheri, Luhanga Musumadi, Litaba Efraim Kolobe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anqaa Almutairi *Department of Nursing, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6688-7757
Abdulmohsen Alsaawi *Department of Emergency, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaleem Alatassi *Department of Anesthesia, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Abdullah Alghanem *Department of Health Technology Management, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah Blaheed Almutairi *Department of Nursing, Second Clustered - Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mufareh Alkatheri *Department of Medicine, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Luhanga Musumadi *Department of Nursing, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9295-1780
Litaba Efraim Kolobe *Department of Nursing, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Healthcare commissioning is crucial for addressing the increasing demands of the patient population while reducing maintenance and management costs. However, commissioning committee members can encounter several challenges. Therefore, this study comprehensively examined the experiences of members of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee involved in commissioning the Women's Health Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: An exploratory qualitative design was used, utilizing semi-structured interviews guided by Gibbs's reflective cycle. A sample of 11 participants representing diverse healthcare professions was included to capture a broad spectrum of insights. The interviews were conducted within a supportive and anonymous framework, adhering rigorously to the ethical standards established by the King Abdullah International Research Center and Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs. Results: The findings revealed three main themes: (i) the role of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee members, (ii) the reflective experiences of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee members, and (iii) the recommendations of the Commissioning Final Readiness Committee members. These advancements were primarily attributed to the effective communication and collaboration among members. Conclusion: Although the task complexities posed certain challenges, the participants viewed them as valuable learning experiences that contributed to their growth. The Commissioning Final Readiness Committee can significantly impact the commissioning process. Despite encountering uncontrollable factors, maintaining a cohesive team allows members to effectively navigate these difficulties and achieve professional growth.

Indexed as

commissioningexperienceGibbs’s reflective cyclequalitative studythematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41001190
PMCPMC12459371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.