ArticleO&G open2025
A Retrospective Comparison of Antibiotic Regimens for Treatment of Chorioamnionitis.
Article in O&G open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of persistent inflammation in failed recovery after perinatal brain injury: is resolution the cure?Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate antibiotic regimens for the optimization of maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies affected by chorioamnionitis.
methodsA change in the standard antibiotic regimen for chorioamnionitis from ceftriaxone-metronidazole to ampicillin-tobramycin with the addition of metronidazole provided an opportunity to compare the outcomes of these antibiotic regimens in a real-world setting. This single-center retrospective cohort study included individuals with singleton gestations with a diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis who were treated with one of the two antibiotic regimens and who delivered after 24 0/7 weeks of gestation between January 1, 2019, and December 21, 2022, along with their neonates. Individuals with multiple gestations and terminations were excluded. Information about maternal and neonatal characteristics, labor and delivery, and chorioamnionitis diagnosis, as well as neonatal and maternal outcomes, was obtained through chart review. Logistic regression was done to calculate propensity scores for the antibiotic regimen, and the overlap weights method was used to balance the groups. Baseline characteristics included in the propensity score were compared using the standardized mean difference, with a value of at least 0.1 considered significant. Weighted risk differences were used to compare outcomes, with
resultsOverall, 459 maternal-neonatal dyads were identified and included in the analysis, with 276 receiving ceftriaxone-metronidazole and 183 receiving ampicillin-tobramycin. Although the groups initially differed on several characteristics, they were balanced after propensity score weighting. There was no difference in infectious maternal morbidity, postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, admission to a monitored setting, or hysterectomy when ampicillin-tobramycin was compared with ceftriaxone-metronidazole. However, when neonatal outcomes were compared, a lower rate of early-onset neonatal sepsis was present in the group that received ampicillin-tobramycin (3.3% vs 11.1%; weighted risk difference -6.9%, 95% CI, -11.8 to -0.7,
conclusionWe conclude that ampicillin-tobramycin, with the addition of metronidazole for cesarean delivery, is a more appropriate empiric antibiotic choice to treat clinical chorioamnionitis due to reduced rates of early-onset neonatal sepsis when compared with ceftriaxone-metronidazole.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.