ReviewFrontiers in health services2025
Challenges and opportunities for greater public-private partnership for the implementation of the WHO operational framework for building climate resilient health systems to improve malaria control and elimination in Sub-Saharan Africa: a rapid review.
Review in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From devolution to post-COVID-19 UHC scoping review of human resource for health reforms in Kenya: a signalling and sensemaking analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between climate change and malaria is complex, with both predictable and unpredictable aspects. The impacts of climate change may promote mosquito breeding, increase parasite development rates and extend the geographical range of malaria vectors through increased temperature and rainfall. In addition, climate change influences the transmission of malaria indirectly through social and economic pathways. The gains made in malaria control are evidently under threat. Partnerships to build climate resilient health systems for malaria control in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) should be harnessed to implement the WHO Operational Framework in SSA. This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) guidelines. A search strategy was formulated based on the PECOS framework using BOOLEAN operators "AND" and "OR" for all possible combinations of the following search teams: public-private sector partnerships, public health, and Sub-Saharan Africa. We identified 173 research papers from our database searches, and this systematic review includes 11 articles focusing on the objective of this study. The included studies identified challenges such as ineffective legal and policy frameworks, bureaucracy, limited buy-in and adherence to guidelines by private partners and a lack of systemic integration of climate risk assessments in health planning among others. On the other hand, opportunities lie within the health workforce, essential medicines and technologies, and emergency preparedness and management. These include health workforce education and training through massive open online courses, proper response targeting in partnership with the private sector, and co-production mechanisms for climate change and malaria research. PPPs remain a viable alternative in the adaptation of the WHO Operational Framework despite the challenges they face. This is particularly the case when the technical and financial capacities of the countries in the SSA region are considered. There are lessons to be derived and best practices to be instituted from case studies of previous partnerships, especially in malaria control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.