ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025
Drug shortages: clinical implications and burdens - a trinational multiple-methods study including key stakeholders.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic Shortages: Pharmacists' Experiences, Perspectives, and Perceived Clinical Impacts.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: A network meta-analysis.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the prevalence of drug shortages has markedly escalated in recent years, this study seeks to investigate the associated clinical implications and burdens in Austria, Germany and Kosovo where healthcare systems differ significantly. Methods: The research was conducted as a trinational, multiple-methods study utilising questionnaires and in-depth interviews for different stakeholders, including patients, physicians, pharmacists and manufacturers. Descriptive statistics were applied to summarise and analyse the quantitative dataset, providing key insights into central tendencies and overall data distribution, while qualitative data were analysed using the summarising approach based on Mayring's qualitative content analysis. Results: Manufacturers expressed concerns regarding the intense pressure on pricing amid global inflation. Proposed mitigation strategies were anticipated to incur higher costs, with increased stockpiling in one major country adversely affecting others. Pharmacists across all three nations reported significant disruptions to their clinical practice, with up to fifty per cent of patient encounters being affected by drug shortages, requiring considerable amounts of time to resolve. They expressed feelings of frustration and anger, citing bureaucratic obstacles and excessive regulation as impediments to effective problem-solving. Physicians reported similar challenges in their practice, often resorting to self-initiated solutions and advocating for improved information regarding drug availability. While most patients have been exposed to drug shortages, the majority of these issues were resolved with moderate interruptions to their therapy. The root causes of these problems were primarily attributed to political factors. Conclusion: The results show that drug shortages have significantly disrupted clinical practice across all three countries, with pharmacists and physicians reporting major impacts on patient care and increased time spent resolving issues. Economic pressures, political factors and regulatory obstacles were identified as key causes exacerbating the crisis and highlighting the need for coordinated mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.