Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41001070›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2025

Application of Antimicrobial Peptides in Wound Dressings.

Aoxun Zhu, Baiqi Chen, Jing Ma, Jiajia Wang, Rongfang Tang, Liangeng Liu, Weixin Sun, Xingzhong Zheng, Guangtao Pan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biofilm-Responsive Nanoplatforms for Infected Wound Reconstruction.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aoxun Zhu *Yancheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Baiqi Chen *Yancheng NO.1 People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Jing MaXiangshui County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Jiajia WangYancheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Rongfang TangYancheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Liangeng LiuYancheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Weixin SunYancheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Xingzhong ZhengYancheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.
Guangtao PanYancheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Yancheng, Jiangsu, 224000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1754-3285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Growing antibiotic misuse and the rise of antimicrobial resistance have driven interest in antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as therapeutic agents for wound dressings and clinical wound management. AMPs are short, cationic peptides with broad‑spectrum activity and diverse mechanisms of action that confer a low propensity for resistance development. Methods: We performed a focused literature synthesis to review AMP classification, structural features, antimicrobial mechanisms, and strategies for integrating AMPs into wound dressings. We emphasize materials and delivery approaches reported for hydrogels, electrospun fibers, films, scaffolds, and sponges, and we summarize advances in hybrid systems that combine AMPs with functional materials. Results: AMP‑loaded dressings promote infection control and tissue repair by maintaining a favorable wound microenvironment, enabling controlled peptide release, reducing biofilms, and stimulating cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Hybrid platforms-polysaccharide and stimuli‑responsive hydrogels, metal‑nanoparticle composites, exosome carriers, and cryogels-improve peptide stability and bioavailability while introducing functionalities such as real‑time bacterial sensing, antioxidant activity, and electrical conductivity for electrostimulation. In chronic wounds and burns, AMP‑based dressings show promise for anti‑biofilm activity, immunomodulation, enhanced re‑epithelialization, and reduced risk of resistance compared with conventional antibiotics. Conclusion: We identify key challenges and propose future directions: rational design of tailored AMPs, smart controlled‑release carriers, nanotechnology‑enabled formulations, and strategies to accelerate clinical translation. Advances in these areas are expected to expedite the clinical adoption of AMP‑based wound therapies, offering safer, more effective, and personalized treatment options.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesBandagesWound HealingAnimalsBiofilmsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Peptidesantibioticsantimicrobial materialsantimicrobial peptidesbacterial infectiondrug resistancewound dressingswound healing

Identifiers

PMID41001070
PMCPMC12457083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.