ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Surgery versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in locally advanced gastrointestinal tract cancers.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal tract cancer is still prevalent in the world. Localized GI cancer treatment has greatly relied on surgery, even for locally advanced diseases. Aim and objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the prognosis of direct surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in patients with locally advanced GI tract cancers. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was done on patients diagnosed with locally advanced GI cancers who were treated at Zhejiang Jinhua Guangfu Cancer Hospital between the period Jan 2021 to December 2023, total number of patients was 245. Patients were divided into two cohorts: DS of 107 and CRS of 138. Disease-free survival was the main predictor, while the others were considered secondary endpoints; these were overall survival, pathological complete response rate, postoperative complications, and R0 resection rate. Results: Disease-specific survival benefitted the CRS cohort relative to the DS cohort with a 2-year DFS of 76.81% compared to 65.42% (p= 0. 049). Median DFS also favored the CRS group (34. 7 months Conclusion: Locally advanced GI tract cancer appears to be improved from neoadjuvant-applied chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery rather than upfront surgery. Whereas, the trend about OS was in favor of the CRS approach, perhaps more time is required to observe these differences. The multimodal technique had reasonable presurgical toxicities and did not worsen the rate of postoperative complications. These findings support the consideration of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be recommended as a viable treatment approach for locally advanced GI tract cancers but future comparative prospective trials must be conducted to determine long-term survivals and quality of life patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.