Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000919›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

What one sees depends on how far the eye has moved.

Y Howard Li, Michele A Cox, Jonathan D Victor, Michele Rucci

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Y Howard LiDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester.ORCID 0000-0002-5596-1816
Michele A CoxCenter for Visual Science, University of Rochester.ORCID 0000-0002-6822-6503
Jonathan D VictorFeil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-0111
Michele RucciDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-1964

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MICHELE RUCCI · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
CENTRAL PROCESSING OF VISUAL INFORMATIONR01EY007977 · NEI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Jonathan D Victor · 1989 to 2026
$9.0M
Function of Fixational Instability During Natural ViewingR01EY018363 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI RUCCI, MICHELE · 2007 to 2025
$7.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007977NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans explore visual scenes through frequent, rapid gaze shifts known as saccades. These movements redirect the high-acuity region of the retina toward objects of interest, thus selecting information based on location. Here, we show that saccade amplitude provides a separate and complementary form of selection, effectively filtering visual information by spatial frequency rather than location. Specifically, a reduction in saccade amplitude attenuates post-saccadic visual sensitivity in an amplitude-dependent range of low spatial frequencies. This effect is highly robust, so that even minute changes in saccade size considerably affect visibility. We show that this phenomenon arises from the way the magnitude-dependent kinematic characteristics of saccades transform the visual world into a spatiotemporal flow: post-saccadic visibility closely follows theoretical predictions based on the spatial information that saccade transients convey within the temporal bandwidth of retinal sensitivity. Thus, saccades not only guide selection based on location, but also filter visual information based on content, actively shaping perception.

Identifiers

PMID41000919
PMCPMC12458177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.