Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000879›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

A phylogenetic estimate of canine retrotransposition rates based on genome assembly comparisons.

Matthew S Blacksmith, Anthony K Nguyen, John V Moran, Jeffrey M Kidd

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew S BlacksmithDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2993-9009
Anthony K NguyenDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9634-1904
John V MoranDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Jeffrey M KiddDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9631-1465

Funding

Gen. &Mol. Analysis of Human LINE-1 RetrotranspositionR01GM060518 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORAN, JOHN V. · 1999 to 2024
$4.8M
Michigan Predoctoral Training in GeneticsT32GM149391 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHN V. MORAN · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
Identification of Factors Critical for SINE RetrotranspositionR01GM140135 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KIDD, JEFFREY M, MORAN, JOHN V. · 2021 to 2024
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060518NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140135NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM149391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Due to their history of domestication and breed formation, dogs are a powerful system for studying the phenotypic impact of genetic variation. Comparison of canine genome assemblies show that retrotransposons, mobile elements which mobilize through an RNA intermediate, are a major contributor to canine genetic diversity with an eightfold and 17-fold increase of LINE-1 and SINE differences, respectively, in dogs relative to that found among humans. The frequency of dimorphic retrotransposon insertions among dogs suggests these elements have mobilized at a high rate over recent canine evolution. However, the rate at which new insertions arise has yet to be determined. Results: We aligned a collection of genome assemblies derived from four breed dogs, a Dingo, and an American grey wolf to a Greenland grey wolf to identify dimorphic LINE-1 and SINEC insertions. Across our panel of seven canine assemblies, we identified a total of 7,428 dimorphic LINE-1s and 51,572 dimorphic SINECs. Each assembly differs from the Greenland wolf genome by an average of 3,497 LINE-1s and 25,558 SINECs. Analysis of allele sharing among samples recapitulates known relationships and reveals substantial within-breed variation. Calibrating estimates using a previously estimated single nucleotide mutation rate of 4.5×10 Conclusions: Our phylogenetic estimate of SINEC retrotransposition in canines is approximately twice as large as that estimated for

Indexed as

CanineGenome AssembliesLINE-1Mobile ElementsMutation RateReference AssembliesRetrotranspositionSINE

Identifiers

PMID41000879
PMCPMC12458276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.