ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Network dynamics underlying activity-timescale differences between cortical regions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Network-level dynamics are thought to be central to computation in the cerebral cortex. Yet, how these dynamics differ across areas remains poorly understood. We leveraged an intrinsic property of cortical regions to tackle this problem - the timescales over which they spontaneously sustain activity. We first co-registered functional and spatial transcriptomics datasets to show that timescales across the mouse cortex are predicted by many transcript categories, including those that regulate circuit wiring. Next, we used simultaneous two-photon imaging and optogenetics in mice to ask how these putative differences in connectivity lead to distinct network responses to brief, focal excitatory input to a short-timescale visual area, VISp, and a long-timescale frontal area, MOs. MOs neurons were more likely to respond to photostimulation of their neighbors. Moreover, the evoked dynamics of the overall network were much longer lasting in MOs than VISp, due to the more prevalent recruitment of late-responding neurons, which formed reliable activity sequences. Overall, our findings show that, beyond single-neuron timescales, different cortical areas are distinctly wired to sustain input over varying time windows via network dynamics, with important implications for our understanding of cortical computation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.