ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
MOAST: Mechanism of Action Similarity Tool.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining the mechanism of action (MOA) for natural products remains a significant bottleneck in drug discovery, particularly for researchers with limited computational resources or small compound libraries. Traditional approaches require screening large numbers of annotated compounds alongside unknowns, which is cost-prohibitive, or depend on complex machine learning models that need substantial computational resources and large datasets. Here, we present a dissertation chapter excerpt: MOAST (Mechanism of Action Similarity Tool), a BLAST-inspired computational workflow that addresses these limitations by providing rapid MOA hypotheses for newly screened compounds. This chapter investigates two complementary approaches: a kernel density estimation (KDE) method providing statistical significance measures and E-values for MOA class membership, and a CatBoost machine learning classifier for multi-class prediction with ranked outputs. Using cytological profiling data from HeLa and A549 cell lines, MOAST achieved 22% accuracy for the top 5 predictions among ~
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.