ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Sex differences in transcription-associated mutagenesis in the human germline.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In humans, germline mutation rates are three- to four-fold higher in males than females for largely unknown reasons. We investigated whether transcription, a well-documented source of both DNA damage and repair in somatic tissues, is associated with sex differences in germline mutations. We used single-cell germline expression data from different stages of gametogenesis in males and females and phased de novo mutations from pedigrees. Focusing on protein-coding genes, we found no relationship between the male mutation rate and averaged gene expression levels during spermatogenesis despite evidence for transcription-asymmetry. Individual stages of spermatogenesis appear to vary in their contribution to mutation, however: expression levels in spermatogonial stem cells and sperm are significantly positively associated with paternal mutation rates, while those in primary spermatocytes are significantly negatively associated. Thus, transcription may have varying effects over male gametogenesis that are not visible from its cumulative effect on the total germline mutation rate. By contrast, the female mutation rate increases significantly with transcription levels averaged across different stages of folliculogenesis, with corresponding evidence for transcription-asymmetry. The difference between the sexes is also observed when using a smaller set of phased mutations from three-generation pedigrees and when relying on expression data from bulk gonadal tissues. These results indicate that transcription has distinct effects on the mutation rate in the two sexes, leading to more mutations in females but not males, in contrast to what one might expect from the overall paternal bias in germline mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.