ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Microbes and diet reshape the intestine via distinct cellular dynamics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The intestine adapts to environmental stimuli by dynamically altering its size. Infections causes shrinkage and subsequent regrowth to original intestinal dimensions, suggesting homeostasis, whereas diet can induce adaptive changes. Whether diet and infection differ in the kinetics, magnitude, or cellular mechanisms that drive intestinal resizing, and whether intestines use a fixed size "memory" versus an adaption to nutrient availability, still remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether intestinal regrowth after infection reflects a fixed "memory" of a target size (homeostasis) or an adaptation to the nutritional state during regrowth, and to identify the cellular modalities that drive infection- and diet-induced resizing. Design: Using Results: Infection-induced atrophy occurred only when the intestine was initially large, and regrowth required nutrient availability. Distinct cellular mechanisms underpinned changes in intestinal size: diet-induced growth in unchallenged intestines was mediated by enterocyte hypertrophy, whereas post-infection regrowth required intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation. Consistently, ISC ablation impaired regrowth only after infection. Bacteria functioned both as pathogens and nutrients, triggering intestinal shrinkage when damaging a large organ, but promoting growth when consumed by nutrient-deprived flies. Conclusion: Intestinal regrowth after infection reflects a context-dependent, diet-driven adaptation, not a fixed intestinal size memory. Diet and infection engage distinct, stimulus-specific cellular programs to reshape the midgut, revealing a modular logic of organ plasticity with implications for tissue repair and metabolic regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.