ReviewO&G open2024
Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies as Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.
Review in O&G open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePregnant patients are at increased risk of severe illness, in-hospital mortality, and preterm birth in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, they often are excluded from clinical trials that analyze improved therapeutics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Thus, there are relatively few available data that examine the safety of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in pregnant patients with COVID-19, which we aimed to explore in this systematic review. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar on September 30, 2022. Included studies encompassed English-language case reports with at least five participants, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, retrospective or prospective chart reviews, and randomized controlled trials that enrolled pregnant women who received SARS-CoV-2-targeted mAbs. Studies were screened for eligibility using Covidence according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines and were subsequently evaluated for risk of bias with the JBI critical appraisal checklist. TABULATION INTEGRATION AND
resultsInitial search yielded 616 studies; 13 publications were ultimately eligible. Pregnant patients were treated with SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing mAbs casirivimab-imdevimab, bamlanivimab, or bamlanivimab-etesevimab. A total of 365 patients were treated with casirivimab-imdevimab, 13 were treated with bamlanivimab, and 11 were treated with bamlanivimab-etesevimab. There were no cases of maternal mortality. Eighteen of the 389 patients had adverse effects related to mAb administration-all resolved. Of the patients treated with casirivimab-imdevimab, there were 35 preterm deliveries, two fetal deaths, one neonatal death due to sepsis, five cases of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM), one case of PROM, and 24 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Of the patients treated with bamlanivimab, there was one case of preterm PROM and one preterm delivery. There were no NICU admissions in the bamlanivimab or bamlanivimab-etesevimab cohorts.
conclusionPreliminary data suggest that neutralizing mAb treatment for COVID-19 in pregnant patients is safe. However, treatment-associated events support the importance of clinical trials to determine the statistical significance of maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant patients treated with SARS-CoV-2-targeted mAbs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.