ArticleO&G open2024
Intersection of Nativity and English Proficiency With Receipt of Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling.
Article in O&G open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Access to and quality of contraceptive healthcare for undocumented immigrant women in California.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess disparities in receipt of person-centered contraceptive counseling among a nationally representative sample of U.S.- and foreign-born individuals with differing English proficiency.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the 2017-2019 wave of the National Survey of Family Growth and included female respondents aged 15-49 years who received contraception services in the previous 12 months and provided responses to all four items of the Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling measure. We categorized respondents into four groups: 1) U.S.-born individuals who speak English very well, 2) foreign-born individuals who speak English very well, 3) U.S.-born individuals who speak English less well, and 4) foreign-born individuals who speak English less well. We created an adjusted logistic regression model, with receipt of person-centered contraceptive counseling as the outcome and the four nativity-English proficiency groups as the primary independent variable, then calculated the predicted probability of receiving person-centered contraceptive counseling for each group, adjusted for age, income, urban or rural status, and parity as covariates. We also assessed the four Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling items individually.
resultsOur final study sample included 2,221 respondents (weighted N=26,531,058). Respondents who spoke English very well had comparable adjusted predicted probabilities of reporting person-centered counseling regardless of nativity (52.2% [95% CI, 48.5-55.9%] for U.S.-born individuals and 50.6% [95% CI, 38.2-62.9%] for foreign-born individuals). Among respondents who spoke English less well, U.S.-born individuals had a lower adjusted probability of reporting person-centered counseling than foreign-born individuals (31.0% [95% CI, 13.5-48.5%] vs 40.6% [95% CI, 29.2-52.0%], respectively). The largest disparities were for the items related to letting the respondent say what mattered most to them about their birth control and taking their preferences about their birth control seriously.
conclusionPerson-centered contraceptive counseling was lower for respondents with limited English proficiency, particularly among U.S.-born individuals; English proficiency mitigated disparities by nativity. Clinicians should prioritize person-centered contraceptive care, especially for patients with limited English proficiency.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.