ArticleDigital health
Evaluating the content and quality of irritable bowel syndrome videos on social media platforms in China: Focus on TikTok and Bilibili.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of the quality and reliability of infertility information on Chinese social media platforms Bilibili and TikTok : a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- TikTok, Xiaohongshu, and Bilibili as sources of medical information on lung cancer: a multi-platform content evaluation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Quality, content structure, and reliability of prostatitis-related information on short-video platforms: a cross-platform analysis of TikTok and Bilibili.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Alcohol-related health information on Chinese short-video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis of Douyin and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of aortic dissection-related health information on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Do likes reflect quality? Engagement metrics and information reliability of robotic surgery short videos.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Status of Medical Aesthetic Science Popularization Videos on Social Media in China: Characteristics and Quality Assessment.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Assessing the content and quality of gout-related videos on video platforms: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
- Article
- The quality and reliability of herpes zoster information on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent functional gastrointestinal disorder that significantly impairs quality of life. Social media has become a primary source of health information, with TikTok and Bilibili emerging as popular video-sharing platforms in China. The present study aims to assess the content, quality, and user engagement of IBS-related videos on Bilibili and TikTok in China, identifying strengths and weaknesses in online health information and offering insights for improving patient education. Methods: Hundred qualified videos from each platform were analyzed. Videos were categorized by platforms, sources, contents, and quality (using Global Quality Score and modified DISCERN scoring systems). Statistical analyses included correlation analysis and linear regression to assess relationships between video quality and engagement metrics. Results: Videos showed an increasing trend from 2020 to 2024. TikTok videos were shorter (median 61.0 s vs. 220.0 s) with higher engagement. Healthcare professionals (77.0%) and science communicators (15.5%) were primary content creators. Linear regression revealed significant platform differences: on TikTok, higher quality videos had negative associations with likes and comments; on Bilibili, higher quality showed positive associations with all engagement metrics (likes, favorites, shares, and comments). Conclusions: Platform-specific differences exist in how users engage with IBS-related content on Chinese social media platforms. The divergent relationship between video quality and engagement metrics on TikTok versus Bilibili suggests that content creators may need platform-specific strategies to effectively deliver high-quality health information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.