Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000566›Full record

ArticleO&G open2025

Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasonography for Endometriosis According to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis Consensus.

Ido Mick, Shay M Freger, Melissa Marien, Mahsa Gholiof, Mathew Leonardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in O&G open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Patient-Centred Perspectives on Diagnostic Strategies for Endometriosis: A Qualitative Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ido MickDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Shay M FregerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Melissa MarienDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Mahsa GholiofDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Mathew LeonardiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) in detecting deep endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and superficial endometriosis using the IDEA (International Deep Endometriosis Analysis) consensus and novel International Terminology definitions for endometriosis phenotypes.

methodsThis prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at McMaster University from November 2021 to January 2023. Participants included 125 individuals aged 18-50 years with suspected endometriosis who were undergoing TVUS followed by laparoscopic surgery. The index test, TVUS, was performed in accordance with the IDEA consensus, with results compared with laparoscopy and histopathologic findings, which served as the reference standard.

resultsThe study demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for endometriomas and deep endometriosis with TVUS, achieving a sensitivity of 95.0% for left ovarian endometrioma, 94.9% for right ovarian endometrioma, and sensitivity ranging from 84.3% to 100% for various deep endometriosis sites. Transvaginal ultrasonography showed high specificity for endometriomas (98.9%) and deep endometriosis (range 97.0-100%). However, TVUS showed lower sensitivity for superficial endometriosis (range 4.0-43.5%) but high specificity (99.0-100%) and PPV (90.0-100%). The accuracy of detecting superficial endometriosis improved when cases with ovarian endometriosis, deep endometriosis, and pouch of Douglas obliteration were excluded.

conclusionTransvaginal ultrasonography demonstrates robust diagnostic accuracy for deep endometriosis and ovarian endometriosis, reaffirming its utility as a first-line diagnostic tool in endometriosis management despite changes in definitions of deep endometriosis and superficial endometriosis. However, its sensitivity for superficial endometriosis remains limited, suggesting the need for additional diagnostic techniques or refined ultrasound approaches for accurate detection of superficial endometriosis. The findings support the integration of TVUS in clinical practice while highlighting the need for further advancements in diagnosing superficial endometriosis to mitigate diagnostic delays.

Identifiers

PMID41000566
PMCPMC12456513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.