ArticleO&G open2025
Perspectives of Spanish-Speaking Women on Telemedicine for Contraceptive Care.
Article in O&G open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe use of telemedicine for reproductive health increased during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but people with language barriers are less likely than others to use it. The objective of this study is to describe the perspective of Spanish-speaking immigrant women on the use of telemedicine to access reproductive health services, including contraception.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using in-person and virtual focus groups with primarily Spanish-speaking reproductive-aged women who reside in a suburban area outside of New York City. We recruited participants through flyers, social media, and a partnership with a community-based organization. We analyzed interview transcripts using grounded theory methodology.
resultsBetween May and November 2022, we conducted six in-person and two virtual focus groups with a total of 58 participants. Most participants were from Mexico and Guatemala and had limited experience with telemedicine. Participants recognized that telemedicine has practical advantages, including economic ones. However, many expressed concerns about the quality of virtual health care, which they felt led to "guesswork," because it is not possible to conduct a physical examination. When prompted, participants recognized that telemedicine could be a viable option to provide information about different contraceptive options and to initiate some contraceptive methods such as pills. Low technological literacy and lack of access to cell service were often cited as barriers to using telemedicine.
conclusionTo ensure equal access to telemedicine among underserved populations, it is important to understand their needs and perspectives. Educating prospective users about the value and limitations of telemedicine and overcoming technological barriers are essential steps in ensuring digital health equity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.