Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000559›Full record

ReviewO&G open2025

Approach to Diagnosis and Management of Clitorodynia.

Jill Krapf, Rachel Pope

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in O&G open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jill KrapfCenter for Vulvovaginal Disorders Florida, Tampa, Florida; and the Division of Female Sexual Health, Urology Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio.
Rachel PopeCenter for Vulvovaginal Disorders Florida, Tampa, Florida; and the Division of Female Sexual Health, Urology Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clitorodynia, pain involving the clitoris, is considered a localized form of vulvodynia. This review aims to provide the general obstetrician-gynecologist a general framework for diagnostic evaluation of clitorodynia. This is simplified by dividing chronic clitoral pain into structural causes and neuropathic causes. Knowledge of clitoral anatomy, including the corona of the glans clitoris, symptomatology, and evaluation based on the concept of regions is necessary in evaluating chronic clitoral pain. Structural causes are clitoral adhesions or phimosis with debris or keratin pearls, which may be managed with in-office lysis of clitoral adhesions. Neuropathic causes include pudendal neuralgia and meningeal and spinal pathology determined with neurophysiologic testing, imaging studies, and diagnostic nerve blocks. Treatment includes behavioral measures, pelvic floor physical therapy, serial nerve blocks, and targeted nerve release procedures. Obstetrician-gynecologists are well-positioned to identify and provide first-line approaches to diagnosis and treatment of clitorodynia.

Identifiers

PMID41000559
PMCPMC12456546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.