ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Results of surgical treatment for grade IV-V spondylolisthesis using
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis remains a complex and multifaceted task requiring an individual approach in each case. The diverse treatment modalities and conflicting techniques used in this treatment indicate a limited understanding of this condition in modern medicine. In this study, we report our results on implementing a modified in situ technique for the surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis. Hypothesis: In high-grade lumbar spondylosis, especially grades IV and V, posterior fixation using a specially designed transpedicular screw is effective in terms of adequate decompression and reliable stabilization leading to intervertebral fusion. Methods: This study is a prospective review of 24 consecutive patients with grades IV and V lumbar spine malalignment who underwent surgery between 2019 and 2022. The surgical technique was unique in that it allowed the surgeon to perform extensive spinal canal decompression, deformity reduction, and fixation with custom-designed pedicle screws in a single stage. Patients were followed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually. Clinical, radiological, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) data were collected. Results: Among 24 patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis at the L5-S1 level, good results were achieved in 62.5% of patients. The median follow-up period was 16 months (12; 24 months). All patients, except one case, had bone fusion at the level of vertebral fixation within 6 months. The radiographic parameters after surgery showed statistically significant differences. No deep infections were recorded. The mean VAS and ODI scores demonstrated improvement in pain and disability. Conclusions: This procedure allows for adequate reduction of severe spondylolisthesis with favorable clinical and radiological results. Despite the need for surgical intervention, the procedure was safe and reproducible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.