ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement using a novel hybrid dilator technique: A clinical series of 565 screws.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Woodpecker variable-speed drilling protocol for robot-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement: technique and a consecutive series of 1027 screws.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical pedicle screws provide superior biomechanical fixation with pullout strength four times greater than lateral mass screws, but placement is technically demanding with traditional malposition rates of 6.7%-31.6%. Robotic-assisted spine surgery has demonstrated success in thoracolumbar applications, but cervical translation has been hindered by the lack of cervical-specific instrumentation requiring expensive custom instruments. Methods: We developed a hybrid technique combining robotic guidance with standard cervical instrumentation using minimally invasive surgery dilators as an interface. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement with 565 screws across C2-C7 levels using MazorX Stealth robotic system with O-arm navigation. Accuracy was assessed using Gertzbein-Robbins and Neo classification systems with 3-6-month follow-up for complications. Results: The technique achieved 98.76% clinically acceptable accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins Grade A + B) with 1.24% breach rate. Perfect placement (Grade A) occurred in 95.22% of screws. Vertebral artery protection was excellent with 99.65% showing no foramen breach. Major complications occurred in 1.5% of patients (single vertebral artery injury), with 7.7% experiencing transient C5 weakness that resolved completely. No patients required revision surgery. Conclusions: This hybrid technique addresses instrument compatibility barriers in robotic cervical spine surgery by eliminating dependence on custom instruments while maintaining robotic accuracy. The technique demonstrates superior outcomes compared to traditional approaches and facilitates broader robotic cervical surgery adoption. Multi-center validation studies are needed to establish the generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.