Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000491›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement using a novel hybrid dilator technique: A clinical series of 565 screws.

Abhishek Soni, S Vidyadhara, Madhava Pai Kanhangad, T Balamurugan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abhishek SoniManipal Institute of Robotic Spine Surgery, Manipal Comprehensive Spine Care Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
S VidyadharaManipal Institute of Robotic Spine Surgery, Manipal Comprehensive Spine Care Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Madhava Pai KanhangadDepartment of Orthopaedics, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
T BalamuruganManipal Institute of Robotic Spine Surgery, Manipal Comprehensive Spine Care Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical pedicle screws provide superior biomechanical fixation with pullout strength four times greater than lateral mass screws, but placement is technically demanding with traditional malposition rates of 6.7%-31.6%. Robotic-assisted spine surgery has demonstrated success in thoracolumbar applications, but cervical translation has been hindered by the lack of cervical-specific instrumentation requiring expensive custom instruments. Methods: We developed a hybrid technique combining robotic guidance with standard cervical instrumentation using minimally invasive surgery dilators as an interface. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent robot-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement with 565 screws across C2-C7 levels using MazorX Stealth robotic system with O-arm navigation. Accuracy was assessed using Gertzbein-Robbins and Neo classification systems with 3-6-month follow-up for complications. Results: The technique achieved 98.76% clinically acceptable accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins Grade A + B) with 1.24% breach rate. Perfect placement (Grade A) occurred in 95.22% of screws. Vertebral artery protection was excellent with 99.65% showing no foramen breach. Major complications occurred in 1.5% of patients (single vertebral artery injury), with 7.7% experiencing transient C5 weakness that resolved completely. No patients required revision surgery. Conclusions: This hybrid technique addresses instrument compatibility barriers in robotic cervical spine surgery by eliminating dependence on custom instruments while maintaining robotic accuracy. The technique demonstrates superior outcomes compared to traditional approaches and facilitates broader robotic cervical surgery adoption. Multi-center validation studies are needed to establish the generalizability.

Indexed as

Cervical pedicle screwsminimally invasive surgerynavigationrobotic surgeryspine instrumentation

Identifiers

PMID41000491
PMCPMC12459924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.