ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology
Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.
Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing and Cost Consideration in Surgery for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence For Current Urology Reports.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Therapeutic efficacy and predictive factors for a successful outcome after platelet-rich plasma injections in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care. Objectives: To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males. Design: Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database. Methods: Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted. Results: Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), Conclusion: AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.