ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Early Electrophysiological Study of CC7 Transfer to Median Nerve and Deep Branch of Ulnar Nerve by Medial Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to the possibility of intrinsic muscle recovery, we modified the traditional contralateral cervical seventh (CC7) nerve transfer to repair both the median nerve and deep branch of the ulnar nerve (DBUN) for patients with total brachial plexus avulsion (TBPA). Methods: A retrospective comparative study of different CC7 transfers for patients with TBPA was carried out. The modified group (20 patients) had CC7 transfer to the median nerve and DBUN by ulnar nerve with vascular pedicle and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. The control group (20 patients) had traditional CC7 transfer to median nerve by ulnar nerve with vascular pedicle. Results: Motor unit potentials (MUPs) could be recorded in the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and dorsal interosseous muscle in 5 and 2 patients, respectively, in the modified group, whereas nobody had MUP in the ADM or dorsal interosseous muscle in the control group. There was significant difference between the 2 groups in the recovery of MUPs in ADM. As for median nerve recovery, there were no statistical differences in the positive rates of MUPs in abductor pollicis brevis. No significant differences of compound motor action potential existed in flexor digitorum profundus of index finger or flexor carpi radialis between the 2 groups. Conclusions: From the perspective of electrophysiology, it was possible to regenerate intrinsic muscles using CC7 transfer to the median nerve and DBUN by pedicled ulnar nerve and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve in patients with TBPA while not affecting the recovery of the median nerve.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.