Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41000427›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Quantitative Analysis of Male Versus Female Frontal Bone and Orbital Skeletal Morphology.

Meagan Wu, Lauren K Salinero, Ashley E Chang, Jonathan H Sussman, Benjamin B Massenburg, Zachary D Zapatero, Mariana O Almeida, Derek M Steinbacher, Jesse A Taylor, Jordan W Swanson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meagan WuFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Lauren K SalineroFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Ashley E ChangFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Jonathan H SussmanFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Benjamin B MassenburgFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Zachary D ZapateroFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Mariana O AlmeidaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Derek M SteinbacherDivision of Plastic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Jesse A TaylorFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Jordan W SwansonFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
Scott P BartlettFrom the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Oral Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the field of facial feminization surgery expands, plastic surgeons have increasingly sought to better understand differences in skeletal morphology between men and women. This study investigated sex-based differences in the frontal bone and orbital regions by quantitatively describing morphological variability in an adult cisgender population. Methods: We reviewed healthy adults who underwent head computerized tomography imaging before orthognathic surgery. Standardized sets of 501 digital landmarks were used to capture surface morphometrics of the forehead, supraorbital ridges, and orbital rims. All landmarked crania were aligned using Generalized Procrustes Analysis. Principal component analysis evaluated the contribution of sex to the overall variance in coordinates. Using robust rank aggregation, a ranked list of important landmarks or "features" most predictive of sex was generated after integrating mean feature differences, linear discriminant analysis, and random forest importance scores. Results: A total of 154 patients were analyzed, including 70 (45%) men and 84 (55%) women imaged at 23.6 ± 7.7 and 26.0 ± 11.1 years of age, respectively. A list of 119 important features with significant aggregate rank scores ( Conclusions: We identified key anatomical regions of the upper facial third with the greatest sex-based variability. Our findings provide an objective framework upon which continued investigations of skeletal dimorphisms may be performed and provide preliminary data to help guide preoperative counseling and surgical planning for facial feminization surgery.

Identifiers

PMID41000427
PMCPMC12459598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.