ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Quantitative Analysis of Male Versus Female Frontal Bone and Orbital Skeletal Morphology.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Sex Shapes Facial Morphology in Adults: A 3D Geometric Morphometric Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Orbital anatomical variations between the Southern China and the Kashi populations based on 3D-CT analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the field of facial feminization surgery expands, plastic surgeons have increasingly sought to better understand differences in skeletal morphology between men and women. This study investigated sex-based differences in the frontal bone and orbital regions by quantitatively describing morphological variability in an adult cisgender population. Methods: We reviewed healthy adults who underwent head computerized tomography imaging before orthognathic surgery. Standardized sets of 501 digital landmarks were used to capture surface morphometrics of the forehead, supraorbital ridges, and orbital rims. All landmarked crania were aligned using Generalized Procrustes Analysis. Principal component analysis evaluated the contribution of sex to the overall variance in coordinates. Using robust rank aggregation, a ranked list of important landmarks or "features" most predictive of sex was generated after integrating mean feature differences, linear discriminant analysis, and random forest importance scores. Results: A total of 154 patients were analyzed, including 70 (45%) men and 84 (55%) women imaged at 23.6 ± 7.7 and 26.0 ± 11.1 years of age, respectively. A list of 119 important features with significant aggregate rank scores ( Conclusions: We identified key anatomical regions of the upper facial third with the greatest sex-based variability. Our findings provide an objective framework upon which continued investigations of skeletal dimorphisms may be performed and provide preliminary data to help guide preoperative counseling and surgical planning for facial feminization surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.