ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Continuous Through-the-lumen Microvascular Anastomosis: A Retrospective Review of a Modified Technique.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Second or subsequent microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstructive surgery: a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Comparison of continuous single-layer and traditional interrupted suturing techniques in stoma surgery: a retrospective single-center study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The debate between continuous and interrupted sutures for microvascular anastomosis has long persisted, with broader acceptance of the interrupted technique. Although studies show comparable outcomes, continuous suturing remains underused due to concerns of technical complexity, anastomotic constriction, and patency loss. We present a simplified and effective continuous technique that addresses these concerns. Methods: This 5-year retrospective study included all elective free tissue transfers performed using the described continuous suture technique. Trauma-related replantation and revascularization cases were excluded. Patient records were reviewed for demographics, flap types, anastomosis configuration and timing, reexplorations, complications, and outcomes. Results: The technique was performed in 785 patients, encompassing 2346 microvascular anastomoses (794 arterial and 1552 venous). End-to-end anastomoses were done in 633 arteries and 867 veins, and end-to-side anastomoses in 161 arteries and 685 veins. Flap types included anterolateral thigh (n = 384), radial forearm (n = 220), fibula (n = 145), latissimus dorsi (n = 29), deep inferior epigastric artery (n = 2), ulnar forearm (n = 3), and toe transfers (n = 2). Mean arterial and venous anastomosis times were 7.5 and 10 minutes, respectively. All anastomoses achieved 100% immediate patency. There were 41 reexplorations, mostly for venous issues, with 28 flap failures. The overall flap success rate was 96.43%. Conclusions: This modified continuous technique enables posterior wall repair through the vessel lumen without flipping, minimizing manipulation and reducing operative time. It offers a reproducible, efficient approach for both arterial and venous anastomoses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.